Teclistamab in combination with daratumumab and lenalidomide in multiple myeloma (MajesTEC-2 study)

Introduction: Combination of daratumumab (Dara) and lenalidomide (Len) may enhance the function of teclistamab (Tec), potentially resulting in improved antimyeloma activity in a broader population. We present initial safety and efficacy data of Tec-Dara- Len combination in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in a phase 1b study (MajesTEC-2;NCT04722146). Method(s): Eligible patients who received 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT), including a proteasome inhibitor and immune-modulatory drug, were given weekly doses of Tec (0.72-or- 1.5 mg/kg with step-up dosing) + Dara 1800 mg + Len 25 mg. Responses per International Myeloma Working Group criteria, adverse events (Aes) per CTCAE v5.0, and for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) per ASTCT guidelines, were assessed. Result(s): 32 patients received Tec-Dara- Len (0.72 mg/kg, n = 13;1.5 mg/kg, n = 19). At data cut-off (11 July 2022), median follow-up (range) was 5.78 months (1.0-10.4) and median treatment duration was 4.98 months (0.10-10.35). Median age was 62 years (38-75);87.5% were male. Median prior LOT was 2 (1-3), 18.8% were refractory to Dara and 28.1% refractory to Len. CRS was most frequent AE (81.3% [n = 26], all grade 1/2), 95% occurred during cycle1. Median time to onset was 2 days (1-8), median duration was 2 days (1-22). No ICANS were reported. Frequent Aes (>=25.0% across both dose levels) were neutropenia (75.0% [n = 24];grade 3/4: 68.8% [n = 22]), fatigue (43.8% [n = 14];grade 3/4: 6.3% [n = 2]), diarrhoea (37.5% [n = 12];all grade 1/2), insomnia (31.3% [n = 10];grade 3/4: 3.1% [n = 1]), cough (28.1% [n = 9];all grade 1/2), hypophosphatemia (25.0% [n = 8];all grade 1/2), and pyrexia (25% [n = 8];grade 3/4: 6.3% [n = 2]). Febrile neutropenia frequency was 12.5% (n = 4). Infections occurred in 24 patients (75.0%;grade 3/4: 28.1% [n = 9]). Most common were upper respiratory infection (21.9% [n = 7]), COVID-19 (21.9% [n = 7]), and pneumonia (21.9% [n = 7]). Three (9.4%) had COVID-19 pneumonia. One (3.1%) discontinued due to COVID-19 infection and this patient subsequently died of this infection. Overall response rate (ORR, median follow-up) was 13/13 (8.61 months) at 0.72 mg/kg and 13/16 evaluable patients (less mature at 4.17 months) at 1.5 mg/kg. 12 patients attained very good/better partial response at 0.72 mg/kg dose, and response was not mature for 1.5 mg/kg group. Median time to first response was 1.0 month (0.7-2.0). Preliminary pharmacokinetic concentrations of Tec-Dara- Len were similar as seen with Tec monotherapy. Tec-Dara- Len- treatment led to proinflammatory cytokine production and T-cell activation. Conclusion(s): The combination of Tec-Dara- Len has no new safety signals beyond those seen with Tec or Dara-Len individually. Promising ORR supports the potential for this combination to have enhanced early disease control through the addition of Tec. These data warrant further investigation.

Preliminary results from phase 2 of CC-92480- MM- 001: Mezigdomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)

In phase 1 of CC-92480- MM- 001 (NCT03374085), the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of mezigdomide plus dexamethasone (MEZI-d) was selected at 1 mg once daily for 21/28 days. Here we report preliminary results from the MEZI-d dose-expansion cohort in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM. Key eligibility criteria were: RRMM;>=3 prior lines of therapy;disease progression <=60 days of last myeloma therapy;refractoriness to lenalidomide/pomalidomide, a proteasome inhibitor, a glucocorticoid, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Oral mezigdomide 1 mg was given on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle, plus weekly dexamethasone (40 mg;20 mg if >75 years of age). Primary objective was to evaluate efficacy (overall response rate [ORR]);secondary objectives included safety/tolerability and additional efficacy assessments. Pharmacodynamics was an exploratory objective. As of 16/Sep/2022, 101 patients had received MEZI-d at the RP2D. Median age was 67 (range 42-85) years, median time since initial diagnosis was 7.4 (1.1-37.0) years;39.6% of patients had plasmacytomas and 37/101 patients had high-risk cytogenetics (56/101 not evaluable). Median number of prior regimens was 6 (3-15);prior therapies included stem cell transplantation (77.2%) and anti-BCMA therapy (29.7%). All patients were refractory to last myeloma regimen and triple-class refractory. Median follow-up was 7.5 (0.5-21.9) months, with a median of 4 (1-20) cycles;10.0% of patients continued treatment;progressive disease was the main reason for discontinuation (60.4%). ORR was 40.6% for all patients. Whilst data are not mature yet, median PFS was 4.4 (95% CI 3.0-5.5) months and median duration of response was 7.6 (95% CI 5.4-9.5) months. ORR was 30.0% in patients with plasmacytomas (N = 40) and 50.0% in patients with prior anti-BCMA therapy (N = 30). Ninety-one (91.1%) patients experienced a grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Most frequent hematologic grade 3/4 TEAEs were neutropenia (75.2%), anaemia (35.6%), and thrombocytopenia (27.7%);34.7% of patients had grade 3/4 infections, including grade 3/4 pneumonia (15.8%) and COVID-19 (7.0%). Occurrence of other grade 3/4 non-hematologic TEAEs was generally low. Due to TEAEs, 76.2% and 29.7% of patients had mezigdomide dose interruptions and reductions, respectively;90.1% of patients discontinued mezigdomide. Mezigdomide induced substrate degradation and increases in activated and proliferating T cells in patients, including those directly refractory to pomalidomide-based therapies. MEZI-d had a manageable safety profile with encouraging efficacy in patients with triple-class refractory RRMM, including patients with prior BCMA-targeted therapies. These results strongly support the continued development of mezigdomide in MM, and especially in combination.

INTERIM RESULTS OF THE PML-16, PML-19 PROTOCOLS FOR PRIMARY MEDIASTINAL LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA THERAPY

Introduction. Primary mediastinal lymphoma (PML) is an aggressive lymphoid tumor treatment success of which is determined by induction therapy. To date, none of the standard chemotherapy regimens (CT) have demonstrated an advantage in efficacy. Intensive therapy programs are associated with high toxicity. Aim - to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of two pilot prospective treatment protocols PML-16 and PML-19 as well as the possibility of using the analysis of freely circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to assess MRD in patients with PML. Materials and methods. From January 2016 to January 2022, 34 previously untreated PML patients were included in the study;average age - 32;stage > I - in 60 %;extramediastinal lesions - in 14.7 %;bulky disease - in 73.5 % of patients. Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) was performed;ctDNA was determined to assess the completeness of remission. Results. Eighteen patients received treatment according to the PML-16 protocol (6 courses of chemotherapy;2 blocks of RmNHL-BFM-90 + 4 courses of R-EPOCH). After the end of therapy, all 18 patients achieved PET-negative remission. The next 16 patients received treatment according to the PML-19 protocol (4 courses of chemotherapy;2 blocks of R-mNHL-BFM-90 + 2 courses of R-EPOCH) in combination with lenalidomide. After the end of therapy, 9 (56 %) patients achieved PET-negative remission;7 (44 %) retained pathological activity (D4-5 points). After 3 and 6 months 15 (94 %) patients achieved normalization of metabolic activity. Considering the high frequency of false-positive results in patients with PML, a ctDNA study was performed to determine the depth of remission in 15 patients. After the end of therapy, all 15 patients had complete elimination of ctDNA. Of these, 5 (33 %) remained PET-positive at the end of treatment. During further observation, after 3-6 months, in 4 patients the level of metabolic activity decreased to physiological without the use of consolidating therapy. After the end of therapy, one patient suffered the new coronavirus infection, COVID-19. A month later, residual formation of SUVmax 14.2 remained in the mediastinum. The patient is currently under observation. With a median follow-up of 36 months (9 to 76 months) all 34 patients are in remission. Conclusion. The effectiveness of PML-16 made it possible to abandon the consolidation therapy and refuted the idea of the need for 6 courses of CT. The combination of programs based on the application of the principle of high-dose short-pulse induction of remission (R-mNHL-BFM-90) in combination with the prolonged administration of medium doses (R-EPOCH) was crucial in achieving a successful result. The inclusion of lenalidomide in the "PML-19" program made it possible to achieve complete remission in 100 % of cases after 4 courses. The possibility of using DNA analysis to assess MRD in patients with PML was shown.Copyright © 2022 Izdatel'stvo Meditsina. All rights reserved.

Anaplastic extramedullary plasmacytoma resistant to novel therapies: A case report

The treatment of choice for extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP) is radiotherapy (RT). It is under discussion whether the management of an anaplastic form of EMP requires the addition of systemic therapy. We present a case of a 66-year-old male who was diagnosed with anaplastic plasmacytoma of the maxillary sinus. After the exclusion of multiple myeloma, Dara-VMP (daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisolone) regimen was initiated. During the third cycle of Dara-VMP, a progression of the tumor was observed. RT and BRd (bendamustine, dexamethasone, and lenalidomide) regimen were initiated. After 4 cycles of BRd, disease progression was established. KRd (carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) regimen was initiated. The first cycle of KRd was not completed, as the patient was diagnosed with COVID-19. After the infection, the progression of EMP was observed. In this case, the anaplastic EMP was resistant to RT and chemotherapy regimens with novel agents, including a monoclonal antibody, an immunomodulatory drug, and proteasome inhibitors. Copyright © 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.

INTERIM RESULTS OF THE PML-16, PML-19 PROTOCOLS FOR PRIMARY MEDIASTINAL LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA THERAPY.

Introduction. Primary mediastinal lymphoma (PML) is an aggressive lymphoid tumor treatment success of which is determined by induction therapy. To date, none of the standard chemotherapy regimens (CT) have demonstrated an advantage in efficacy. Intensive therapy programs are associated with high toxicity. Aim - to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of two pilot prospective treatment protocols PML-16 and PML-19 as well as the possibility of using the analysis of freely circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to assess MRD in patients with PML. Materials and methods. From January 2016 to January 2022, 34 previously untreated PML patients were included in the study;average age - 32;stage > I - in 60 %;extramediastinal lesions - in 14.7 %;bulky disease - in 73.5 % of patients. Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) was performed;ctDNA was determined to assess the completeness of remission. Results. Eighteen patients received treatment according to the PML-16 protocol (6 courses of chemotherapy;2 blocks of RmNHL-BFM-90 + 4 courses of R-EPOCH). After the end of therapy, all 18 patients achieved PET-negative remission. The next 16 patients received treatment according to the PML-19 protocol (4 courses of chemotherapy;2 blocks of R-mNHL-BFM-90 + 2 courses of R-EPOCH) in combination with lenalidomide. After the end of therapy, 9 (56 %) patients achieved PET-negative remission;7 (44 %) retained pathological activity (D4-5 points). After 3 and 6 months 15 (94 %) patients achieved normalization of metabolic activity. Considering the high frequency of false-positive results in patients with PML, a ctDNA study was performed to determine the depth of remission in 15 patients. After the end of therapy, all 15 patients had complete elimination of ctDNA. Of these, 5 (33 %) remained PET-positive at the end of treatment. During further observation, after 3-6 months, in 4 patients the level of metabolic activity decreased to physiological without the use of consolidating therapy. After the end of therapy, one patient suffered the new coronavirus infection, COVID-19. A month later, residual formation of SUVmax 14.2 remained in the mediastinum. The patient is currently under observation. With a median follow-up of 36 months (9 to 76 months) all 34 patients are in remission. Conclusion. The effectiveness of PML-16 made it possible to abandon the consolidation therapy and refuted the idea of the need for 6 courses of CT. The combination of programs based on the application of the principle of high-dose short-pulse induction of remission (R-mNHL-BFM-90) in combination with the prolonged administration of medium doses (R-EPOCH) was crucial in achieving a successful result. The inclusion of lenalidomide in the "PML-19" program made it possible to achieve complete remission in 100 % of cases after 4 courses. The possibility of using DNA analysis to assess MRD in patients with PML was shown.Copyright © 2022 Izdatel'stvo Meditsina. All rights reserved.

Impact of Covid-19 in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Who Are Candidates for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Introduction: Recent studies have shown an increased risk of covid infections in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) compared to patients withoutMM, a reduction in the number of new diagnoses ofMMin 2020 compared to 2019 as well as a decrease in the survival of newly diagnoses patients. The general objective of this study was to analyze the possible impact of covid-19 pandemic in the treatment plan for patients withMM who are candidates for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Material(s) and Method(s): All patients with MM who received autologous HSCT in our hospital between March 2020 and October 2021 has been included in the study. This period coincides with the beginning of the confinement for covid-19 in our country and the date of which 88,4% of the population over 12 years of age had received the complete vaccination schedule at that time according to official data. Patient demographics, disease-related variables were obtained from the patient's medical record. On the other hand, treatment-related variables were collected from the eprescription program. Results and discussion: A total of 13 patients were undergoing induction treatment or underwent autologous HSCT during the study period, 62% were men. The median age of the patients was 55 years (30-69). Almost all patients (92,3%) were affected in some way the planned treatment. The reasons were the following: the induction treatment had to be prolonged in 5 patients (increase in the number of cycles due to the impossibility of performing the HSCT), in 4 patients the induction treatment had to be changed (bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone for bortezomib/ thalidomide/dexamethasone) due to the impossibility of performing apheresis as planned after the third cycle, 2 patients had delay in starting second-line treatment after disease relapse or in starting consolidation treatment and 1 patient suffered a delay in the diagnosis of relapse (delay in the planned CT scan confirming progression). Conclusion(s): Although we cannot yet know the impact on survival, the covid-19 pandemic has meant an alteration in the treatment plan of practically all myeloma patients who are candidates for HSCT and who were receiving anti-myeloma therapy in our hospital in the first 18 months after the declaration of the pandemic in our country.

Successful use of lenalidomide to treat refractory acquired von Willebrand disease associated with monoclonal gammopathy.

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is a rare hematologic disorder characterized by quantitative or qualitative defects of von Willebrand factor (vWF), a protein crucial for normal hemostasis. AVWS has been described in association with several pathologic entities with varied mechanisms. Among these, lymphoproliferative disorders are the most common, with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) being the most frequently reported. AVWS in this setting is commonly associated with the development of bleeding that is clinically challenging to manage due to accelerated clearance of vWF, limiting the utility of many conventional treatment modalities such as DDAVP or vWF/FVIII. We report a case of a 43-year-old male who was sent to our institution for new-onset easy bruising and laboratories concerning for von Willebrand disease (vWD). Further diagnostic workup revealed evidence of an IgG monoclonal gammopathy and findings suggestive of vWF inhibition. Ultimately, he was found to have monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance (MGCS)-associated AVWS refractory to conventional treatment but responsive to lenalidomide and dexamethasone. This case suggests that lenalidomide may be suitable for patients with AVWS secondary to MGCS.

Interim Results of the Pml-16, Pml-19 Protocols for Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma Therapy

Introduction. Primary mediastinal lymphoma (PML) is an aggressive lymphoid tumor treatment success of which is determined by induction therapy. To date, none of the standard chemotherapy regimens (CT) have demonstrated an advantage in efficacy. Intensive therapy programs are associated with high toxicity. Aim - to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of two pilot prospective treatment protocols PML-16 and PML-19 as well as the possibility of using the analysis of freely circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to assess MRD in patients with PML. Materials and methods. From January 2016 to January 2022, 34 previously untreated PML patients were included in the study;average age - 32;stage > I - in 60 %;extramediastinal lesions - in 14.7 %;bulky disease - in 73.5 % of patients. Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET- CT) was performed;ctDNA was determined to assess the completeness of remission. Results. Eighteen patients received treatment according to the PML-16 protocol (6 courses of chemotherapy;2 blocks of R-mNHL-BFM-90 + 4 courses of R-EPOCH). After the end of therapy, all 18 patients achieved PET-negative remission. The next 16 patients received treatment according to the PML-19 protocol (4 courses of chemotherapy;2 blocks of R-mNHL-BFM-90 + 2 courses of R-EPOCH) in combination with lenalidomide. After the end of therapy, 9 (56 %) patients achieved PET-negative remission;7 (44 %) retained pathological activity (D4-5 points). After 3 and 6 months 15 (94 %) patients achieved normalization of metabolic activity. Considering the high frequency of false-positive results in patients with PML, a ctDNA study was performed to determine the depth of remission in 15 patients. After the end of therapy, all 15 patients had complete elimination of ctDNA. Of these, 5 (33 %) remained PET-positive at the end of treatment. During further observation, after 3-6 months, in 4 patients the level of metabolic activity decreased to physiological without the use of consolidating therapy. After the end of therapy, one patient suffered the new coronavirus infection, COVID-19. A month later, residual formation of SUVmax 14.2 remained in the mediastinum. The patient is currently under observation. With a median follow-up of 36 months (9 to 76 months) all 34 patients are in remission. Conclusion. The effectiveness of PML-16 made it possible to abandon the consolidation therapy and refuted the idea of the need for 6 courses of CT. The combination of programs based on the application of the principle of high-dose short-pulse induction of remission (R-mNHL-BFM-90) in combination with the prolonged administration of medium doses (R-EPOCH) was crucial in achieving a successful result. The inclusion of lenalidomide in the "PML-19" program made it possible to achieve complete remission in 100 % of cases after 4 courses. The possibility of using DNA analysis to assess MRD in patients with PML was shown.

Risk Factors of Infection in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) Regimen: Real-Life Results of a Large Single-Center Study.

Lenalidomide-based regimens are effective treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, they are associated with an increased risk of infectious complications. This study examines the clinical factors influencing the occurrence of infection in MM patients treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd). A retrospective analysis of all patients who received the Rd regimen between 2017 and 2021 at our institution was performed. The study group consisted of 174 patients and the median age was 65 years. Most patients (n = 110, 63.2%) received the Rd treatment in second-line treatment. The majority of patients (64.3%) received bortezomib-based regimens in the first line of treatment. The median progression-free survival was 12.6 (95% CI: 9.5-16.2) months, and the median overall survival was 22.3 (95% CI: 15.9-28.6) months. The overall response rate was 64.1%, 12.7% of patients achieved complete response, and 20.4% had a very good partial response. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, hypoalbuminemia (OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.6-11.2, p = 0.0039), autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) before Rd (OR 2.6, 95% CI: 1.0-6.7, p = 0.048), and anemia grade ≥3 (OR 5.0, 95% CI: 1.8-14.0, p = 0.002) were independent factors related to the occurrence of infections. In conclusion, in this large cohort of RRMM patients, AHSCT before Rd regimen therapy, hypoalbuminemia, and anemia during treatment were identified as three independent factors influencing the frequency of infections during Rd therapy. Patients with established risk factors may benefit from optimal supportive therapy.

CARTITUDE-2 Cohort A: Updated Clinical Data and Biological Correlative Analyses of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel (cilta-cel) in Lenalidomide-Refractory Patients With Progressive Multiple Myeloma (MM) After 1-3 Prior Lines of Therapy (LOT)

Context: CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) Cohort A is assessing cilta-cel in lenalidomide-refractory patients with progressive MM after 1-3 prior LOT. Objective(s): To present updated results from CARTITUDE-2 Cohort A. Design(s): Phase 2, multicohort study. Patient(s): Lenalidomide-refractory patients with progressive MM after 1-3 prior LOT (PI and IMiD included) and no previous exposure to BCMA-targeting agents. Intervention(s): Single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0.75x106 CAR+ viable T-cells/kg) after lymphodepletion Main Outcome Measure(s): Primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10-5. Management strategies were used to reduce risk of movement/neurocognitive adverse events (MNTs). Pharmacokinetics (PK) (Cmax/Tmax of CAR+T-cell transgene levels), cytokine release syndrome (CRS)-related cytokines over time, peak cytokine levels by response/CRS, association of cytokine levels with immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and CAR+T-cell CD4/CD8 ratio by response/CRS/ICANS are being evaluated. Result(s): As of January 2022 (median follow-up [MFU] 17.1 months), 20 patients (65% male;median age 60 years;median 2 prior LOT;95% refractory to last LOT) received cilta-cel. Overall response rate was 95% (90% >=complete response;95% >=very good partial response). Median times to first and best response were 1.0 month and 2.6 months, respectively. All 16 MRD-evaluable patients achieved MRD negativity at 10-5. Median duration of response was not reached. At 12 months, event-free rate was 79% and progression-free survival rate was 75%. 95% of patients had CRS (gr3/4 10%);median time to onset was 7 days and median duration was 3 days. Neurotoxicity was reported in 30% of patients (5 gr1/2;1 gr3/4) and ICANS in 15% (all 3 gr1/2);1 patient had gr2 facial paralysis. No MNTs were observed. 1 death occurred due to COVID-19 (treatment-related), 2 due to progressive disease, and 1 due to sepsis (not treatment-related). Preliminary PK analyses showed peak CAR-T cell expansion at day 10.5;median persistence was 153.5 days. Conclusion(s): At MFU of 17.1 months, a single cilta-cel infusion resulted in deep and durable responses in lenalidomide-refractory MM patients with 1-3 prior LOT. We will present updated PK/cytokine/CAR-T subset analyses and clinical correlation to provide novel insights into biological correlates of efficacy/safety in this population. Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc.

L-MIND: Safety and Efficacy of Tafasitamab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma on Treatment for at Least 2 Years

Context: Durable responses with the immunotherapy tafasitamab+lenalidomide were previously reported in ASCT-ineligible patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) in the Phase II L-MIND trial (NCT02399085). Based on L-MIND, tafasitamab+lenalidomide received accelerated approval (US) and conditional approval (EU and other countries) in this setting. Objective: To describe the long-term efficacy and safety of tafasitamab+lenalidomide in L-MIND patients who received treatment for ≥2 years. Methods: Ongoing, multicenter, open-label, single-arm Phase II study. Eligibility: ≥18 years old, histologically confirmed DLBCL, and 1–3 prior systemic therapies for DLBCL, including ≥1 anti-CD20 therapy. Tafasitamab: twelve 28-day cycles (12 mg/kg IV) QW during Cycles 1–3, with a loading dose on Cycle 1 Day 4;Q2W Cycles 4–12. Lenalidomide: 25 mg PO Cycles 1–12 Days 1–21. Cycle 13+ tafasitamab monotherapy Q2W until disease progression. Time-to-event, treatment response, and safety endpoints were assessed. Results: Of 80 patients in the full analysis set, 27 (34%) received treatment for ≥2 years (median: 4.3 years). At data cut-off (February 15, 2022), 23 of 27 patients were confirmed alive, one was lost to follow-up, one died with unknown cause, and two died following adverse events (AEs) unrelated to study treatment. Thirteen patients remained on treatment, including six with treatment ≥5 years. Fourteen patients discontinued tafasitamab after ≥2 years due to progressive disease (n=4), patient/physician's decision (n=8), and non-treatment-related fatal AEs (n=2: one each, COVID-19 and cardiovascular AE). Among the 27 patients who received treatment for ≥2 years, the AE analysis for patients receiving tafasitamab+lenalidomide combination therapy (Cycles 1–12) and tafasitamab monotherapy (Cycles 13–24) by exposure-adjusted incidence revealed lower incidence of AEs during tafasitamab monotherapy compared with combination therapy. The majority of AEs were Grade 1–2. The most common AEs (≥1 event/patient-year) were neutropenia and diarrhea during combination (incidence, all-grade/Grade ≥3 AEs: 3.87/1.91 and 1.04/0.04, respectively) and following monotherapy (incidence, all-grade/Grade ≥3 AEs: 0.87/0.45 and 0.32/0.0, respectively). Conclusions: Tafasitamab+lenalidomide followed by tafasitamab monotherapy provided durable responses, with long-term treatment efficacy in those patients who received tafasitamab for up to 5 years. The adverse event burden decreased as patients transitioned from combination therapy to tafasitamab monotherapy. Funding: MorphoSys AG.

ADDITION OF IXAZOMIB TO POMALIDOMIDE AND DEXAMETHASONE IMPROVES PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL FOR MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS PROGRESSING ON LENALIDOMIDE AS PART OF 1ST LINE THERAPY: ALLIANCE A061202

Background: Lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance and continuous LEN-based induction therapy until disease progression have become standard of care for frontline therapy of multiple myeloma (MM). As such, an increasing number of patients (pts) in need of 2nd line therapy have LEN-refractory disease. Optimal treatment in this setting has not been rigorously assessed in randomized studies. The phase I portion of Alliance A061202 demonstrated the safety of the ixazomib-pomalidomide-dexamethasone (IXA-POM-DEX) combination for the treatment of pts with LEN and proteasome inhibitor (PI)-refractory MM. Aims: In the randomized phase II portion, we evaluated the addition of IXA to POM-DEX for PI naïve / sensitive pts progressing on LEN as part of 1st line therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), depth of response, survival and safety. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to IXA-POM-DEX or POM-DEX and stratified by prior bortezomib exposure, International Staging System stage (1 and 2 vs 3) and the presence of high-risk cytogenetics. POM was administered at 4 mg on days 1-21;IXA 4 mg on days 1, 8 and 15;and DEX 20 mg (>75 years (yrs)) or 40 mg (≤75 yrs) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression, the emergence of unacceptable side effects or withdrawal of treatment consent. Results: 38 and 39 eligible pts were assigned to IXA-POM-DEX and POM-DEX, respectively. The median age was 66 yrs (range 41-83) and 64 yrs (range 52-85). A planned first interim analysis was conducted after 43 out of 57 required events had occurred. PFS favored the IXA-POM-DEX arm (one-sided log rank test value = 4.6345, p=0.03134 [< p-value boundary of 0.058]), yielding a hazard ratio of 0.528 (upper 90% bound = 0.777). A stratified log-rank test found that PFS was superior for the triplet after adjusting for stratification factors (one-sided stratified log rank test value = 5.8371;p=0.0157), adjusted hazard ratio 0.451 (upper 90% bound = 0.694). The ORR favored IXA-POM-DEX (63.2% vs 43.6%, p=0.0853), and the ≥very good partial response was 26.3% vs 5.1%, respectively (p=0.01). The clinical benefit rate (ORR + minimal response rate) was 73.7% and 56.4%. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events included lymphopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and fatigue in 40%, 37%, 16% and 16% of IXAPOM-DEX-treated pts and 26%, 21%, 13%, and 15% of POM-DEX-treated pts. Therapy was discontinued for disease progression in 47.4% of pts on IXA-POM-DEX and 76.9% of pts on POM-DEX and for adverse events in 7.9% and 7.7% of pts, respectively. Summary/Conclusion: The addition of IXA to the POM-DEX backbone improved the depth of response and PFS for pts relapsing on LEN as part of 1st line therapy. Hematologic toxicity was increased with the addition of IXA, but side effects were manageable. The ease of administration of this all-oral combination allowed for safer, uninterrupted treatment during the COVID pandemic. Our results should be confirmed in phase III trials but lend support for this regimen as part of 2nd line therapy for this patient population.

DREAMM-9: PHASE I STUDY OF BELANTAMAB MAFODOTIN PLUS STANDARD OF CARE IN PATIENTS WITH TRANSPLANT-INELIGIBLE NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA

Background: The bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) regimen is a standard of care for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) is a B-cell maturation antigen-binding antibody-drug conjugate that eliminates myeloma cells by a multimodal mechanism: direct cell kill and anti-myeloma tumor immune response. Belamaf has demonstrated deep and durable responses as a monotherapy in the DREAMM-2 study of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Preclinical evidence of belamaf in combination with bortezomib or lenalidomide suggests enhanced anti-myeloma activity, providing rationale for this treatment combination. Aims: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of this combination in adult pts with transplant-ineligible (TI) NDMM and establish the recommended Phase III dose. Methods: DREAMM-9 (NCT04091126) is an ongoing Phase I, open-label, randomized study of belamaf + VRd. The belamaf dose cohorts currently being evaluated are Cohort 1 (1.9 mg/kg Q3/4W), Cohort 2 (1.4 mg/kg Q6/8W), Cohort 3 (1.9 mg/kg Q6/8W), Cohort 4 (1.0 mg/kg Q3/4W), and Cohort 5 (1.4 mg/kg Q3/4W). Belamaf is given with VRd Q3W until Cycle 8, and with Rd Q4W thereafter. After evaluation of safety data for Cohort 1, Cohorts 2-5 were opened in parallel and enrolled pts were randomized 1:1:1:1. Primary endpoint is safety. Secondary endpoints include efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK). Results: As of data cutoff (07 Dec 2021), 64 pts were analyzed across all cohorts. Median age (range) was 73.0 (51- 88) years, 55% were male, 80% were white, 8% had extramedullary disease, 59% were International Staging System stage II or III, 20% had amp1q, and 17% had high-risk cytogenetics (≥1 of: t(4;14), t(14;16), del17p). The median duration of follow-up varied: Cohort 1 (17.4 months [mo]), Cohort 2 (5.9 mo), Cohort 3 (6.1 mo), Cohort 4 (4.7 mo), Cohort 5 (5.8 mo). Median number of belamaf cycles were: Cohort 1 (6), Cohort 2 (3), Cohort 3 (3.5), Cohort 4 (4.5), and Cohort 5 (5). Most common adverse events (AEs) across cohorts included thrombocytopenia (49%), constipation (43%), diarrhea (32%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (30%). AEs related to study treatment were experienced by 61 (97%) pts. Belamaf-related grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 24 (38%) pts. Belamaf dose reductions occurred in 11 (18%) pts, with dose delays in 10 (16%) pts. Three pts experienced a fatal severe AE (unrelated to study treatment);2 due to COVID-19 infection, 1 due to pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Early deep responses were observed;67-92% pts achieved ≥very good partial response (VGPR) (Table), with median time to VGPR of 2.1-2.9 months across cohorts. Of pts with ≥VGPR, 17 were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative, 10 in Cohort 1. As of data cutoff, 8-75% of pts achieved best response of complete response (CR) or stringent CR (sCR). Grade 3 corneal exam findings were reported in 25-58% of pts;grade 3 visual acuity changes were reported in 21-75% of pts. No grade 4 corneal exam findings or visual acuity changes were reported in pts receiving belamaf Q6/8W, compared with 0-17% and 0-8%, respectively, in the Q3/4W cohorts. Belamaf PK profile was similar to that in pts with RRMM, accounting for baseline characteristics. Image: Summary/Conclusion: Belamaf + VRd demonstrated high response rates in pts with TI NDMM, with a high rate of MRD negativity indicating deep responses. No new safety signals were observed relative to DREAMM-2. Study is ongoing to evaluate the safety and efficacy of variable dose intensities of belamaf in combination with VRd.

DARATUMUMAB CARFILZOMIB LENALIDOMIDE AND DEXAMETHASONE AS INDUCTION THERAPY IN HIGH-RISK TRANSPLANT ELIGIBLE NEWLY DIAGNOSED MYELOMA PATIENTS: RESULTS OF THE PHASE 2 STUDY IFM 2018-04

Background: High-risk (HR) cytogenetic is associated with poor outcome in transplant eligible (TE) newly diagnosed myeloma multiple myeloma (NDMM). The triplet combination carfilzomib lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRD) plus transplantation demonstrated high efficacy with faorable safety profile in TE-NDMM patients (FORTE). The addition of daratumumab (Dara) to frontline therapy also improed response rate and progression free-surial in TE-NDMM patients (CASSIOPEIA, GRIFFIN). Double transplant also improed outcome of HR TE NDMM patients (EMN02, STAMINA). Aims: The phase 2 trial 2018-04 from the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (IFM) is ealuating an intensie strategy with Dara-KRD induction and consolidation plus double transplant in HR TE NDMM (NCT03606577). Methods: HR MM was defined by the presence of del17p, t(4;14) and/or t(14;16). Stategy includes Dara-KRD induction (6 cycles), autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), Dara-KRD consolidation (4 cycles), second ASCT, Dara-lenalidomide maintenance. The primary endpoint was the feasibility of this intensie strategy. Here, we report efficacy and safety analysis of Dara-KRD induction. Results: Fifty patients with preiously untreated NDMM were included from july 2019 to march 2021 in 11 IFM centers Median age was 57 (range 38 -65). ISS stage 3 was present in 12 (24%) patients. Based on inclusion criteria, all patients had HR cytogenetic, including 17p deletion (n=20, 40%), t(4;14) (n=26, 52%) or t(14;16) (n=10,20%). Forty-six patients completed Dara-KRD induction. Two patients discontinued treatment due to seere aderse eent (COVID-19 infection, n=1 ;drug-induced hepatitis, n=1) and 2 patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression. Grade 3-4 treatment related aderse eent (>5% of patients) were neutropenia (38%), anemia (14%), thrombocytopenia (8%), infection (6%), renal insufficiency (6%) and deep-ein thrombosis (6%). Two patients (6%) experienced stem-cell collection failure. Oerall response rate was 96%, including 92 % > ery good partial response. Among 37/46 ealuable patients post induction, Minimal Residual Disease negatiity rate (NGS, 10-5) was 62%. Summary/Conclusion: Dara-KRD as induction prior ASCT is safe and allows deep responses in TE NDMM patients with high-risk cytogenetic profile. IFM 2018-04 study is ongoing and longer follow-up is needed to ealuate safety and efficacy of the oerall strategy with Dara-KRD induction and consolidation plus double transplant in this subset of HR patients.

QUALITY OF LIFE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA (RRMM) TREATED WITH IXAZOMIB-LENALIDOMIDE-DEXAMETHASONE (IRD): RESULTS OF A REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE STUDY

Background: Comprehensive evaluation of new treatment regimens in RRMM patients both from physician's and patients' perspective is worthwhile. Aims: We aimed to evaluate clinical and patient-reported outcomes during IRd treatment as ≥ 2nd line in RRMM patients in a multicenter real-world evidence study. Methods: Adult patients with RRMM who have been assigned IRd as ≥2nd line treatment were enrolled in 18 centers of Russian Federation from April 2019 till May 2020. Treatment response was evaluated by IMWG 2011 criteria. For assessment of adverse events (AEs) NCI CTCAE v. 4.0 was used. Patients filled out RAND SF-36 and ESAS-R questionnaires at baseline, at 1 and 3 mos, and thereafter every 3 mos till 18 mos after IRd treatment onset. Statistical analysis of patient-reported outcomes was conducted using GEE with adjustment to age, gender and baseline quality of life (QoL). Duration of response (DOR), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the start of IRd treatment were evaluated using Kaplan-Meyer method. Results: In total, 40 patients with RRMM were enrolled into the study: median age - 64 years (range, 33-80), 35% males. Durie-Salmon stage at study entry: II/III - 40/60%, ECOG status 0/1 - 70%, 2/3 - 30%. Median time since initial MM diagnosis - 55 mos (range, 2.0-99.0). Median number of lines of prior therapy - 3 (range, 1-7). Comorbidities were revealed in 65% patients;median Charlson Comorbidity index - 2 (range, 0-5);95% patients had bone complications. The median duration of IRd treatment - 7.5 mos (IQR, 3.9-18.0). Two-thirds of the patients (28/39) responded to therapy. The overall response rate was 46.2% (95%CI: 30.6-61.8), median DOR - 16.3 mos (95%CI: 15.4-17.3). Among them 3 patients achieved complete response, 1 - stringent complete response, 2 - very good partial response, 12 - partial response. Ten patients had minor response. Clinical benefit rate - 71.8% (95%CI: 57.7-85.9). Six patients (15.4%) had stable disease and 4 (10.3%) progressed upon therapy. Median PFS was 10.6 mos (95%CI: 6.3-16.3). During the entire period of the study 5 deaths were registered: 3 were related to progression, 2 - because of COVID-19. Median OS was not reached. One-year OS rate was 85.2% (95%CI: 71.0-99.0). AEs were revealed in 55% patients: grades 1-2 AEs - 15 patients;grades 3-4 AEs - 7 patients;SAEs - 3 patients (neurological toxicity, gastric bleeding, hypotension and diarrhea). Baseline QoL was dramatically impaired by the majority of SF- 36 scales;42% patients experienced severe/critical QoL impairment. At baseline all the patients experienced symptoms;85% with moderate-to severe symptoms (≥4 scores on the scale from 0 to 10). The most prevalent and severe symptoms were tiredness (98%), drowsiness (90%), pain (82%) and shortness of breath (80%). During IRd treatment QoL was stable or improved. Physical and role physical functioning, general health, vitality and mental health significantly improved as compared to baseline (GEE, p<0.05). Twice increase of Integral QoL Index was observed - 0.27 at baseline vs 0.48 at 18 mos (p<0.05). Severity of pain, tiredness and nausea meaningfully decreased during IRd treatment as compared to baseline (GEE, p<0.05). Total ESAS-R score decreased by 10 points at 18 mos of therapy as compared to baseline - 31 vs 21 (GEE, p<0.05). Summary/Conclusion: In summary, results obtained in a real-world evidence study confirmed RCTs data that IRd regimen is an effective treatment in RRMM patients. This treatment is accompanied with definite improvement of QoL. Our results demonstrate benefits of IRd, both from physician's and patient's perspective.

B-CELL MALIGNANCIES TREATED WITH TARGETED DRUGS AND SARS-COV-2 INFECTION. A EUROPEAN HEMATOLOGY ASSOCIATION SURVEY (EPICOVIDEHA)

Background: Patients with lymphoproliferatie diseases (LPD) appear particularly ulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection, partly because of the effects of the anti-neoplastic regimens (chemotherapy, signaling pathway inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies) on the immune system. The real impact of COVID-19 on the life expectancy of patients with different subtypes of lymphoma and targeted treatment is still unknown. Aims: The aim of this study is to describe and analyse the outcome of COVID-19 patients with underlying LPD treated with targeted drugs such as monoclonal antibodies (obinutuzumab, ofatumumab, brentuximab, niolumab or pembrolizumab), BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib), PI3K inhibitors (idelalisib), BCL2 inhibitors (enetoclax) and IMIDs, (lenalidomide). Methods: The surey was supported by EPICOVIDEHA registry. Adult patients with baseline CLL or non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) treated with targeted drugs and laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosed between January 2020 and January 2022 were selected. Results: The study included 368 patients (CLL n=205, 55.7%;NHL n=163, 44.3%) treated with targeted drugs (Table 1). Median follow-up was 70.5 days (range 19-159). Most used targeted drugs were ITKs (51.1%), anti-CD20 other than rituximab (16%), BCL2 inhibitors (7.3%) and lenalidomide (7.9%). Of note, only 16.0% of the patients were accinated with 2 or more doses of accine at the onset of COVID-19. Pulmonary symptoms were present at diagnosis in 244 patients (66.2%). Seere COVID-19 was obsered in 47.8 % patients while 21.7% were admitted to to intensie care unit (ICU), being 55 (26.8%) CLL patients and 25 (15.3%) NHL patients. More comorbidities were reported in patients with seere-critical COVID-19 compared to those with mild- asymptomatic infection (p=0.002). This difference was releant in patients with chronic heart diseases (p=0.005). Oerall, 134 patients (36.4%) died. Primary cause of death was COVID-19 in 92 patients (68.7%), LPD in 14 patients (10.4%), and a combination of both in 28 patients (20.9%).Mortality was 24.2% (89/368) at day 30 and 34.5%(127/368) at day 200. After a Cox multiariable regression age >75 years (p<0.001, HR 1.030), actie malignancy (p=0.011, HR 1.574) and admission to ICU (p<0.00, HR 4.624) were obsered as risk factors. Surial in patients admitted to ICU was 33.7% (LLC 38.1%, NHL 24%). Mortality rate decreased depending on accination status, being 34.2% in not accinated patients, 15.9-18% with one or two doses, decreasing to 9.7% in patients with booster dose (p<0.001). There was no difference in OS in NLH s CLL patients (p=0.344), nor in ITKs s no ITKs treated patients (p=0.987). Additionally, mortality rate dropped from the first semester 2020 (41.3%) to last semester 2021 (25%). Summary/Conclusion: - Our results confirm that patients with B--mallignancies treatted with targeted drugs hae a high risk off seere infection (47.8%) and mortality (36.4%) from COVID-19. - Pressence of comorbidities,, especially heart disease,, is a risk factor for seere COVIID--19 infection in ourr series. - Age >75 years,, actie mallignancy att COVIID--19 onset and ICU admission were mortality risk factors. - COVIID--19 acination was a protectie factor for mortality,, een iin this popullation wiitth humorall immunity impairment. - The learning cure in the management of the infection throughout the pandemiic and the deelopmentt off COVIID--19 treatments showed benefit in this partticullarlly ullnerablle popullation? (Table Presented).

CILTACABTAGENE AUTOLEUCEL IN LENALIDOMIDE-REFRACTORY PATIENTS WITH PROGRESSIVE MULTIPLE MYELOMA AFTER 1-3 PRIOR LINES OF THERAPY: CARTITUDE-2 BIOLOGICAL CORRELATIVE ANALYSES AND UPDATED CLINICAL DATA

Background: Cohort A of the multicohort phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) study is assessing ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who received 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT) and were refractory to lenalidomide (len). This population is difficult to treat and has poor prognosis. Aims: To present updated results from CARTITUDE-2 Cohort A. Methods: All patients provided informed consent. Eligible patients had progressive MM after 1-3 prior LOT that included a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD). Patients were len-refractory and had no prior exposure to BCMA-targeting agents. Patients received a single cilta-cel infusion (target dose: 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) after lymphodepletion. Cilta-cel safety and efficacy were assessed. The primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10-5 by next generation sequencing. Patient management strategies were used to reduce the risk of movement and neurocognitive adverse events (MNTs). Other assessments included pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses (Cmax and Tmax of CAR+ T-cell transgene levels in blood), levels of cytokine release syndrome (CRS)-related cytokines (e.g., IL-6) over time, peak levels of cytokines by response and CRS, association of cytokine levels with immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and CAR+ T cell CD4/CD8 ratio by response, CRS, and ICANS. Results: As of January 2022 (median follow-up: 17.1 months [range: 3.3-23.1]), cilta-cel was administered to 20 patients (male: 65%;median age: 60 years [range: 38-75]). Median number of prior LOT was 2 (range: 1-3);median time since MM diagnosis was 3.5 years (range: 0.7-8.0). 95% of patients were refractory to their last LOT;40% were triple-class refractory. Overall response rate was 95%, with 90% of patients achieving ≥complete response and 95% achieving ≥very good partial response. Median time to first response was 1.0 month (range: 0.7-3.3);median time to best response was 2.6 months (range: 0.9-13.6). All MRD-evaluable patients (n=16) achieved MRD negativity at 10-5. Median duration of response was not reached. The 12-month progression-free survival rate was 75% and the 12-month event-free rate was 79%. CRS occurred in 95% of patients (grade 3/4: 10%), with a median time to onset of 7 days (range: 5-9) and median duration of 3 days (range: 2-12). 30% of patients had neurotoxicity (5 grade 1/2 and 1 grade 3/4). ICANS occurred in 3 patients (15%;all grade 1/2);1 patient had facial paralysis (grade 2). No MNTs were observed. 1 death due to COVID-19 occurred and was assessed as treatment-related by the investigator;2 deaths due to progressive disease and 1 due to sepsis (not related to treatment) also occurred. Based on preliminary PK analyses of CAR transgene by qPCR, peak expansion of CAR-T cells occurred at day 10.5 (range: 8.7-42.9);median persistence was 153.5 days (range: 57.1-336.8). Summary/Conclusion: A single cilta-cel infusion led to deepening and durable responses at this longer follow-up (median 17.1 months) in patients with MM who had 1-3 prior LOT and were len-refractory. Follow-up is ongoing. We will present updated and detailed PK, cytokine, and CAR-T subset analyses as well as clinical correlation to provide novel insights into biological correlates of efficacy and safety in this difficult-to-treat patient population, which is being further evaluated in the CARTITUDE-4 study (NCT04181827;enrollment concluded).

Biological correlative analyses and updated clinical data of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a BCMA-directed CAR-T cell therapy, in lenalidomide (len)-refractory patients (pts) with progressive multiple myeloma (MM) after 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT): CARTITUDE-2, cohort A

Background: Cohort A of the multicohort phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) study is evaluating cilta-cel safety and efficacy in pts with MM who received 1-3 prior LOT and were len-refractory - a difficult- to-treat population with poor prognosis. We present updated results. Methods: Pts had progressive MM after 1-3 prior LOT, including a PI and IMiD, were len-refractory, and had no prior exposure to BCMA-targeting agents. A single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) was given post lymphodepletion. Safety and efficacy were assessed, and the primary endpoint was MRD negativity at 10-5. Management strategies were implemented to minimize risk of movement/neurocognitive AEs (MNTs). Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses (Cmax and Tmax of CAR+ T-cell transgene levels in blood) are being conducted, as well as analyses of levels of CRS-related cytokines (eg, IL-6) over time, peak levels of cytokines by response and CRS, association of cytokine levels with ICANS, and CAR+ T cell CD4/CD8 ratio by response, CRS, and ICANS. Results: As of January 2022 (median follow- up [MFU] 17.1 mo [range 3.3-23.1]), 20 pts (65% male;median age 60 y [range 38-75]) received cilta-cel. Pts received a median of 2 (range 1-3) prior LOT, and a median of 3.5 y (range 0.7-8.0) since MM diagnosis. 95% were refractory to last LOT, and 40% were triple-class refractory. ORR was 95%, 90% achieved CR or better, and 95% had ≥VGPR. Median times to first and best response were 1.0 mo (range 0.7-3.3) and 2.6 mo (range 0.9-13.6), respectively. 16 pts were MRDevaluable, all of whom achieved MRD negativity at 10-5. Median DOR was not reached and 12-mo event-free rate was 79%. The 12-mo PFS rate was 75%. Median time to onset of CRS was 7 d (range 5-9) and occurred in 95% of pts (gr 3/4: 10%), with median duration of 3 d (range 2-12). Neurotoxicity occurred in 30% of pts (5 gr 1/2;1 gr 3/4). 3 pts (15%) had ICANS (all gr 1/2);1 pt had gr 2 facial paralysis. No MNTs were seen. 1 death occurred due to COVID-19 (assessed as tx-related by the investigator), 2 due to progressive disease, and 1 due to sepsis (not related to tx). Preliminary PK analyses indicate that peak expansion of CAR-T cells occurred at d 10.5 (range 8.7-42.9) and median persistence was 153.5 d (range 57.1-336.8). Conclusions: At a longer MFU of 17.1 mo, a single cilta-cel infusion led to deepening and durable responses in pts with MM who had 1-3 prior LOT and were lenrefractory. Follow-up is ongoing. Updated and in-depth PK, cytokine, and CAR-T subset analyses and clinical correlation will be presented and provide novel insights into biological correlates of efficacy and safety in this pt population. This pt population is being further evaluated in the CARTITUDE-4 study (NCT04181827), which has concluded enrollment.

Daratumumab carfilzomib lenalidomide and dexamethasone as induction therapy in high-risk, transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed myeloma: Results of the phase 2 study IFM 2018-04

Background: High-risk (HR) cytogenetic is associated with poor outcome in transplant eligible (TE) newly diagnosed myeloma multiple myeloma (NDMM). The triplet combination carfilzomib lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRD) plus transplantation demonstrated high efficacy with favorable safety profile in TE-NDMM patients (FORTE). The addition of daratumumab (Dara) to frontline therapy also improved response rate and progression free-survival in TE-NDMM patients (CASSIOPEIA, GRIFFIN). Double transplant also improved outcome of HR TE NDMM patients (EMN02, STAMINA). The phase 2 trial 2018-04 from the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (IFM) is evaluating an intensive strategy with Dara-KRD induction and consolidation plus double transplant in HR TE NDMM (NCT03606577). Methods: HR MM was defined by the presence of del17p, t(4;14) and/or t(14;16). Stategy includes Dara-KRD induction (6 cycles), autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), Dara- KRD consolidation (4 cycles), second ASCT, Dara-lenalidomide maintenance. The primary endpoint was the feasibility of this intensive strategy. Here, we report efficacy and safety analysis of Dara-KRD induction. Results: Fifty patients with previously untreated NDMM were included from july 2019 to march 2021 in 11 IFM centers Median age was 57 (range 38 -65). ISS stage 3 was present in 12 (24%) patients. Based on inclusion criteria, all patients had HR cytogenetic, including 17p deletion (n = 20, 40%), t(4;14) (n = 26, 52%) or t(14;16) (n = 10,20%). Forty-six patients completed Dara-KRD induction. Two patients discontinued treatment due to severe adverse event (COVID-19 infection, n = 1 ;drug-induced hepatitis, n = 1) and 2 patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression. Grade 3-4 treatment related adverse event (> 5% of patients) were neutropenia (38%), anemia (14%), thrombocytopenia (8%), infection (6%), renal insufficiency (6%) and deep-vein thrombosis (6%). Two patients (6%) experienced stem-cell collection failure. Overall response rate was 96%, including 92 % > very good partial response. Among 37 (/46) evaluable patients post induction, Minimal Residual Disease negativity rate (NGS, 10-5) was 62%. Conclusions: Dara-KRD as induction prior ASCT is safe and allows deep responses in TE NDMM patients with high-risk cytogenetic profile. IFM 2018-04 study is ongoing and longer follow-up is needed to evaluate safety and efficacy of the overall strategy with Dara- KRD induction and consolidation plus double transplant in this subset of HR patients.

Repurposing Thalidomide, Its Analogue And Apremilast For Possible Antiviral In Situation Of Severe Covid Cytokine Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19, caused by SARS-corona virus-2, is a global wide expanded public health risk at a bizarre level. In this current situation, COVID-19 became a serious emerging pandemic. Choosing drug reusing is a crucial step in identifying the new uses of old established drugs. To achieve a significant and healthy way of treatment in COVID patients within a short duration, drug repurposing is a novel method. OBJECTIVE: The present study concentrated on the molecular docking of thalidomide and its analogues and Apremilast against Coronavirus infectious symptoms, evaluated on virus proteins (Spike Protein, 3cl Protease, Nucleocapsids). METHODS: The present study explores the possibility of repurposing thalidomide for the treatment of SARS-COV-2 infection by assessing and confirming with docking affinity scores of thalidomide & its analogues and Apremilast, with spike protein, 3cl protease, and nucleocapsids. RESULTS: From the study results, thalidomide, pomalidomide, lenalidomide, and Apremilast exhibited better binding affinity to N Protein (4KXJ), Protease (4WY3) and Spike Protein (5WRG). In comparison of targets, N Protein - 4KXJ is the best for the four ligands. It is finalized that all four ligands (Thalidomide - -8.6, Pomalidomide - -8.8, Lenalidomide,and - -8.2,and Apremilast - -8.1) have good docking scores with the target N Protein. CONCLUSION: The present study shows confirmation that thalidomide and its analogues and apremilast as a better fit for treating high risk patients of COVID -19 viral infection which are supposed to promote beneficial effects for both respiratory illnesses like COVID-19 symptoms as well as improve the pathological state of condition.